Which is more dangerous a psychopath or a sociopath? What’s the difference?

The fundamental difference between a sociopath and a psychopath is their motivation, and the means they employ to obtain what they want. A sociopath is essentially all about sales and personal benefit, while a psychopath is all about self-promotion, power, control, dominance.

The sociopath will weigh the benefits vs costs, and will opt for that which will make the most sense in terms of forward movement toward his goals. The psychopath will set his sights on something he deems will benefit him, and begin a strategic plan how best to accomplish the desired outcome. There is little thought to the cost, as he is confident in the outcome, as they will utilize whatever means necessary to ensure a favorable outcome for themselves.

Lastly, in terms of the extent to which they will use and manipulate others, a sociopath will do so, as long as it makes sense, ensuring there’s no negative repercussions afterward. If things “unwind,” he will simply cut his losses and move on to the next opportunity. The psychopath will ensure there is no deal that unwind, as losing territory and what he believes is his by right of conquest is not an option. If some situation starts to “go south,” the psychopath will ensure the other person pays a heavy price for denying him what is due them (what they have decided they want and are therefore entitled to). As such, a psychopath never lets a deal “unwind”, as they will employ any means necessary to ensure that doesn’t happen, including destroying anyone who might dare interfere with his plans and objectives.